3 ms·
This plan is particularly problematic because Google+ is, relatively, a clear failure so far An absurd statement on the face of it (even with the weasel-word q
by wyclif 13y ago
This plan is particularly problematic because Google+ is, relatively, a clear failure so far
An absurd statement on the face of it (even with the weasel-word qualifier), given Google+'s large number of active users. In fact, given the traffic there, I suspect his ridiculous Cupertino fanboism is to blame for not considering Google+ a smashing success.
- rsynnott 13y ago> for not considering Google+ a smashing success. Huh? Does _anyone_ consider Google+ a smashing success? On what basis?
- abenga 13y agoGoogle+ is the 2nd largest social network, with more active users than Twitter. Probably not smashing maybe, but that's success of some sort.
- kryptiskt 13y agoGo to any article on the web with social media buttons, compare the number on the Facebook, Twitter and Google buttons. One of them is one or two magnitudes lower than the others, which?
- wyclif 13y agoSo Google+ is not nearly as big as Facebook. That much is obvious. But Marco interprets that as "failure." Any service with 400 million active users is not one I'd label that way.
- sbuk 13y agoBanding around expressions like "Cupertino fanboism " makes you just as bad, possibly worse.