4 ms·
The problem is that you are depending on commercial entities for basic Internet infrastructure: search, social graph & newsfeed, and real time communications.
by babesh 13y ago
The problem is that you are depending on commercial entities for basic Internet infrastructure: search, social graph & newsfeed, and real time communications.
These companies' goals are not necessarily aligned with goals of an interoperable Internet. This has been repeated over and over again: Twitter locking down its API, the percentage of ads on Google search, lack of privacy on Facebook, etc...
You probably need open source/Wikipedia style alternatives to prevent abuse. They don't have to replace the commercial ones, just provide counterbalance. I think people have tried to create open versions of Twitter, Facebook, and possibly Google but they haven't succeeded.
Wikipedia is an outlier in that it is a non-commercial service versus primarily being code or protocols. Services have ongoing costs which make it much harder for non-commercial entities to survive.
I think the Firefox(?) mobile os is a good start.
- flyinRyan 13y ago>You probably need open source/Wikipedia style alternatives to prevent abuse. Wikipedia is a bad example, as there is plenty of abuse there [1]. [1] http://www.smoblogger.com/wikipedia-sucks/ http://www.smoblogger.com/wikipedia-sucks/ http://homepage.univie.ac.at/horst.prillinger/blog/archives/2004/06/000623.html http://homepage.univie.ac.at/horst.prillinger/blog/archives/... http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100506025259AALnOYX http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100506025259AA... Many more, but it's hard to find them since putting "wikipedia" in your search now causes google to look up those words on wikipedia itself first...