It's not about climate change - it's an analogy. It's not a choice between two evils either (you could round them up AND kill them). And of course you could p

It's not about climate change - it's an analogy. It's not a choice between two evils either (you could round them up AND kill them). And of course you could propose a multitude of different solutions beside or in addition to these. My point was that science cannot be used to justify all the choices you make in cases like these.