2 ms·
Indeed, although people may be disappointed if their framework fails and they have to wait another month for another round of results, but then I suppose the ne
by dom96 13y ago
Indeed, although people may be disappointed if their framework fails and they have to wait another month for another round of results, but then I suppose the next round will come a lot quicker if you have less issues to fix.
No problem at all. Thank you for merging my process spawning silliness. You will definitely see a lot more improvements from me :)
EDIT: A little issue I just noticed: the jester "Front-end server" is shown as "None" when in fact it's "nginx".
- MetaCosm 13y agoI think they would be less disappointed if it meant a consistent schedule. These benchmarks are really a lot of fun, not sure if they change hearts and minds, but they are beautiful and fun. I think being time-boxed rather than implementation-boxed make sense. If you miss a month, you got 30 days to fix it. Also, they could only "update" the test rules quarterly or every 6 months, give the authors a bit of time to respond.