3 ms·

See shawabawa's post below yours.

• laumars 13y ago
  In fairness to many of the commenters in here, I don't think some aspects of that article are very clear. eg the comparison of the improvement seen by women under the alias vs the men under the alias was summarised in one sentence that I'd missed. Plus it doesn't help that the experiment comes across rather unscientific (there's no figures published with their write up aside the sample of people tested, and even there, the numbers of men and women tested were quite different. I'm not trying to undermine this study though. I do believe the differences are just cultural. Just offering up a possible reason why this article hasn't been received well rather than arguing that the male ego is too big to accept that men and women are equal.