3 ms·
Urgh, the summary says basically nothing and is in my opinion fairly vague. And I don't feel like paying $37 bucks to read this once. Also: > The effect was st
by lawl 13y ago
Urgh, the summary says basically nothing and is in my opinion fairly vague. And I don't feel like paying $37 bucks to read this once.
Also:
> The effect was stronger for women who cared more about maths.
No shit? People who are more interested in something are usually better at it?
- pradocchia 13y ago> People who are more interested in something are usually better at it? Yes, but no. It shows that women who care more about math are more sensitive to the reputation/stereotype effects, presumably because they do care.
- mtrimpe 13y agoThe summary says that women are less good at math when doing a test under their own name rather than under an alias. This effect is more pronounced the more the women cares about her math performance. What exactly is vague about that?
- krisoft 13y agoPaper is accesible from the second author's website. Haven't finished reading it yet.