2 ms·
> Of course, it still isn't #1, since that spot is universally reserved for Wikipedia Most likely because both are classified "useful" not "vital".
by ronilan 13y ago
> Of course, it still isn't #1, since that spot is universally reserved for Wikipedia
Most likely because both are classified "useful" not "vital".
- tempestn 13y agoFor sure. And generally it is indeed very handy to have the Wikipedia result come up prominently. It's just interesting that a free, user-moderated encyclopedia as the world's predominant source of source of reference information would have been difficult to imagine circa 1998.