4 ms·
I disagree. If they want to waste time and money spying on us then that just further proves our point because we are normal patriotic Americans with nothing to
by wavesounds 13y ago
I disagree. If they want to waste time and money spying on us then that just further proves our point because we are normal patriotic Americans with nothing to hide.
We're not going to play their game and go off and cover our faces in public or not use the most popular sites on the internet because its a stupid game and isn't worth playing when theres real problems this country faces.
I plan on holding a sign at this protest that says "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." Once everyday normal Americans realize theres nothing to be afraid of these clear violations of the 4th amendment will stop.
- threeseed 13y agoOnce everyday normal Americans realize theres nothing to be afraid of these clear violations of the 4th amendment will stop. Problem is everyday normal Americans fully support these programs. I really wish people were smarter in these situations and rallied around specific, actionable requests e.g. get rid of FISA courts and have the normal legal process with full transparency. Requests that ordinary people can think are sensible, common-sense improvements to make. But hey I guess people just want a fun day out instead of actually implementing meaningful change.
- bendoernberg 13y agoThe demands are: 1. Senate committee to investigate unconstitutional programs, ala Church committee 2. Amend statutes to prohibit blanket surveillance 3. DNI Clapper's resignation for lying to Congress and the American people at the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Glad to see you've done your research, and breathlessly awaiting the nationwide campaign you're organizing that will be "implementing meaningful change."
- dllthomas 13y ago"Common sense isn't." I remember an organization I joined the board of, where an earlier board had removed a section from the standing rules, leaving a gap. The board immediately before us decided this was silly, and obviously we should just re-number. Except this meant going through and updating every document that referenced the standing rules, printing out and distributing the new versions, &c, for an entirely superficial change. We rolled that back. People need to be made to think about the consequences of policy, and unfortunately we don't have a good venue for that - protests aren't it, but our national discussion otherwise seems to be dominated by sound-bytes, gotchas, and the horse race.
- 00rion 13y agoHow about a sign that says "if the government has nothing to fear it has nothing to hide"?