3 ms·
That's quite a high evidence bar to set. Most of the food you eat doesn't meet those criteria. I think a large amount of the incredulity in responses is a comb
by freshhawk 13y ago
That's quite a high evidence bar to set. Most of the food you eat doesn't meet those criteria.
I think a large amount of the incredulity in responses is a combination of being surprised someone would be disinterested in a entire class of relatively safe experiences (I share that feeling) combined with an understanding that your risk analysis is off.
- Xcelerate 13y ago> being surprised someone would be disinterested in a entire class of relatively safe experiences (I share that feeling) combined with an understanding that your risk analysis is off. Why is my risk analysis off? I'm not really sure how with a topic that doesn't have a hard scientific backing, your risk assessment gets more "priority" over mine. You can't weigh different people's probabilities (guesses) with your own probabilities and assume them to be any more correct. We'd have all kinds of nonsensical disagreements if that was the case.
- freshhawk 13y agoI'm comparing your risk assessment to the general consensus opinion among scientists in related fields, since my risk assessment, as someone in a completely different field, carries no weight at all.