> the officers were correct to shoot the dog once it was jumping at them and was undeterred by being kicked The larger question is whether or not the officers

> the officers were correct to shoot the dog once it was jumping at them and was undeterred by being kicked The larger question is whether or not the officers had any business with the dog's owner in the first place. If the answer to that question is no, then none of their actions have any justification, shooting the dog included. And unless there's more to the story about what Leon Rosby was doing (if he wasn't simply filming), then the answer to that question is in fact no.