The wiki explicitly says (under “Is that the final word?”): > No. The Pidgin developers are generally open to, and would encourage integration with keyrings (K

The wiki explicitly says (under “Is that the final word?”): > No. The Pidgin developers are generally open to, and would encourage integration with keyrings (KeyringSupport). and then goes on to state that this is difficult to do, since Pidgin runs on so many different platforms, then stating again that they will happily accept such patches. However, I find it understandable, that the devs don’t go out of their way to support use-cases they don’t feel necessary to support. On their systems, they trust the filesystem and are happy with that, if others don’t have that level of trust in their computer, that’s fine, but not necessarily their problem. My point about the logfiles was that to store these in the keyring (rather than a key to the encrypted files) would probably annoy the keyring somewhat (at least the poorer implementations thereof), given that it is intended for use with few-byte passwords and not multi-megabyte logfiles.