4 ms·
Given Motorola are now owned by the same Google that participates in the PRISM programme (et al), I'm really not sure the encryption matters so much.
by ealexhudson 13y ago
Given Motorola are now owned by the same Google that participates in the PRISM programme (et al), I'm really not sure the encryption matters so much.
- speeder 13y agoGood point, I had forgotten that.
- dserodio 13y agoWith unencrypted communication, any insecure Wifi network is enough to "leak" your information, it's much worse then "only" Google/NSA/etc having access to it.
- ealexhudson 13y agoSure, I was just commenting on the potential ability of the NSA in particular to grab it.
- mirkules 13y agoWhether you data is encrypted or not is really not relevant when the device's OS cannot be trusted. You can encrypt 'till the cows come home, but if the OS is stealing your data before you have a chance to encrypt it, your encryption is worthless. I just want people to stop thinking that encryption is some magic bullet that will solve all communication trust issues.
- bonyt 13y agoIt's not completely worthless - it's the difference between the targeted attacker having your data through the backdoor in your devices OS, and that attacker PLUS anyone on the unsecured wifi in the coffee shop having your data. Yes, it's a difference of degree, not kind; but it's still relevant.