Maybe I am being overly diplomatic, but this author is responding to an article that includes the following paragraph: Women are attention whores. They hear

Maybe I am being overly diplomatic, but this author is responding to an article that includes the following paragraph: Women are attention whores. They hear you have money, and they flock to you. They can’t understand that the entrepreneurial life comes first. You might have to cancel your dinner plans. You might forget an anniversary. Drop a ho, your priorities are straight. This article could easily withstand some combination of s/girlfriend/relationship/ and s/girlfriend/partner/ other than that its title is directly addressing the original article. The original article is fundamentally conceptually broken. (insert political reference about a primary challenge from the left. pick your battles?)