4 ms·
The lisp part isn't necessary (or necessarily helpful), but it's certainly an improvement on embedding C-as-a-string in more C. ...though I am concerned that a
by burke 13y ago
The lisp part isn't necessary (or necessarily helpful), but it's certainly an improvement on embedding C-as-a-string in more C.
...though I am concerned that abstracting this stuff too much makes it less obvious how to optimize for the GPU. This may be a language for people that already have a solid grasp on GPU programming.
- octo_t 13y ago>> embedding C-as-a-string in more C Um. OpenCL/Cuda look absolutely nothing like that.
- _pmf_ 13y ago>> embedding C-as-a-string in more C >Um. OpenCL/Cuda look absolutely nothing like that. Absolutely right. You can also include an external C file from C++ [1]; that makes it so much prettier. [1] http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/heterogeneous-computing/amd-accelerated-parallel-processing-app-sdk/introductory-tutorial-to-opencl/ http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/heterogeneous-comput...