6 ms·
> But most people use whitelist [Citation Needed]. I find this incredibly hard to believe.
by Lewisham 13y ago
> But most people use whitelist
[Citation Needed]. I find this incredibly hard to believe.
- qwerta 13y agoIt should be "most people who blocks JS". Just have look how blocking in Chrome and NoScript Firefox extension works.
- warfangle 13y agoWhy not use just a little bit more advanced of a tool, like Charles, to blacklist/whitelist not only domains but file extensions as well? Then that dirty nasty icky javascript that you hate so much will be blocked from even being requested over the network.
- drdaeman 13y agoThis is an example of idea that would work in practice but being completely broken in theory (URLs don't have files nor extensions, although common URL looks like they do). Another example is JavaScript itself.
- qwerta 13y agoI assume Chrome already does this. If JS is not even executed, there is no reason to request files in script tags. I do not hate JS, I just dont care about it, same thing as Java Applets.