2 ms·
> "found a correlation of 0.04 – which means that there was effectively no relationship at all." This is scary: Independence => 0 correlation but ~(0 correl
by corr0 13y ago
> "found a correlation of 0.04 – which means that there was effectively no relationship at all."
This is scary:
Independence => 0 correlation
but
~(0 correlation => independence)
Please get your basic statistic straight.
- simonster 13y ago"effectively no relationship" and "statistically independent" are not necessarily equivalent claims. Assuming Nutt used a rank correlation statistic (Pearson correlation is not well-suited to ordinal data) then zero correlation most likely implies no linear relationship between ranks. That's not equivalent to independence, but I think it's accurate to characterize it as "effectively no relationship" in the context of a discussion about drug laws. OTOH, a scatterplot would be more diagnostic than a statistic here.