4 ms·
No, he's reacting to allegations about direct ties to Palintir, and failing to respond to the criticism of such a surveillance program.
by jaekwon 13y ago
No, he's reacting to allegations about direct ties to Palintir, and failing to respond to the criticism of such a surveillance program.
- icebraining 13y agoHe's making the point that he has no reason to respond to such criticism, since he's neither involved nor advocates it.
- jaekwon 13y agoHe advocates Palantir's surveillance program for the purpose of copyright protection, using its technological aspects of "immutable auditability" to ensure that the program is used for its intended purpose. The problem is, he assumes that such a thing is possible, when in fact it's more like flimsy DRM that the NSA can quite easily, secretly, bypass.