> Barr seemed to think the CEO of Palantir was the kind of person he could share a plot to disrupt/destroy a journalist's career with, didn't he? So, what? Now

> Barr seemed to think the CEO of Palantir was the kind of person he could share a plot to disrupt/destroy a journalist's career with, didn't he? So, what? Now it's not even guilt by association, but guilt by one party stating a desire to associate with the other?