4 ms·
I agree with you aside from your last comment. That wasn't needed. It's great that we have diversity of opinions on here.
by indlebe 13y ago
I agree with you aside from your last comment. That wasn't needed. It's great that we have diversity of opinions on here.
- mistercow 13y ago>It's great that we have diversity of opinions on here. I agree that the last comment was overly snooty (I think it was in response to the implied snootiness of the original comment, but snootiness does not justify more snootiness). That said, I think there's a bit of an indirection of the point when you go to celebrating "diversity of opinions". Yes, diversity of opinions is good, but there is a difference between "diversity" and "the space of all possibilities". Some opinions are just dumb, and having them doesn't improve the community. More importantly, it is not merely the opinion that is being rejected - it is the attitude accompanying the opinion. If the original comment had been something along the lines of "I'm wary of trying psychoactive drugs because it seems like the brain is a very sensitive organ, and messing with its state could have subtle unintended consequences", then it would be expressing a very similar opinion, but the attitude would be completely different. By the same token, if the original comment had said "You're wasting your life if you don't use psychoactives to broaden your horizons", then that would be a polar opposite opinion, expressed with a similarly unacceptable attitude. I'm happy to see either of those opinions expressed on HN. But I'd happily do without either attitude.
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]