3 ms·
Where are the macrostructures? We don't see Dyson spheres or other evident macroscale engineering. This might be a stupid question, but could the Red Square Ne
by sage_joch 13y ago
Where are the macrostructures? We don't see Dyson spheres or other evident macroscale engineering.
This might be a stupid question, but could the Red Square Nebula be considered a candidate? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Square_Nebula http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Square_Nebula
- PBxdId7wFr 13y agoIt's probably just in need of better imaging, like that old face of Mars from the 70s. Regards,
- Dn_Ab 13y agoI can't say but whenever I hear about something that 'defies' theory [n] I like to take a moment and. Imagine that the anomaly in question was constructed by unimaginably developed beings. Of plasma, computronium and other unmet exotic concepts. Powered by rainbows of gamma radiation from stars coerced into the bellies of super-massive black holes. Then I tidily put away the thought because I know it is not even falsifiable, I don't bother assigning probabilities like unlikely. But the short moment (following such news) of delight at contemplating exotic entities so foreign, that words like conscious and alive are inapplicable is a healthy pastime I much enjoy. [1] http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/01/130111-quasar-biggest-thing-universe-science-space-evolution/ http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/01/130111-quasa...
- anonymous 13y agoWell, it is probably natural. But if I was tasked with building a nebula-sized art project, that's what I would do. Though, I'd also put three planes intersecting the conical surface and showing off the three different conical intersections, then inscribe their equations on a planet orbiting the star at the centre.