4 ms·
That's exactly what I thought. Just last week they put out a warning to US service members stating that confirming the leaks is against the law. Now we have the
by rocky1138 13y ago
That's exactly what I thought. Just last week they put out a warning to US service members stating that confirming the leaks is against the law. Now we have the guy at the top saying the stuff in the news is accurate.
- 46Bit 13y ago> Just last week they put out a warning to US service members stating that confirming the leaks is against the law. Now we have the guy at the top saying the stuff in the news is accurate. The decision to declassify would come from the top.
- rocky1138 13y agoSo if it's declassified, can we see the whole slideshow now? :P
- mpyne 13y agoConfirming the accuracy of classified information is what would be against the law. the Director of National Intelligence declassified parts of what were leaked but unless Sgt. Snuffy happened to be able to remember exactly which parts those were when discussing in public then he would have a difficult time being able to (legally) talk about which is which. The statement from the 'guy at the top', on the other hand, would have been routed through his boss and the NSA General Counsel to ensure that it's only referring to declassified programs.