3 ms·
Because Scala is not Java. Scala is complex. Java will get better with future releases but Scala is certainly not the replacement for Java.
by srameshc 13y ago
Because Scala is not Java. Scala is complex. Java will get better with future releases but Scala is certainly not the replacement for Java.
- eweise 13y agoActually it is be a drop-in replacement for Java and I would argue with case classes, lack of ceremony, no primitive types, etc that it is a simpler language than Java.
- happy_dino 13y agoThat's my experience, too. Of course there are things which are not quite simple in both languages, but in Scala those things are features which actually enable me to solve issues, not some language design failures from 1995 with which we have to live now for the rest of Java's life.