4 ms·
This pops up from time to time on stackoverflow as well: [1]: Favourite programming related academic papers [2]: Influential books every programmer should rea
by maurits 13y ago
This pops up from time to time on stackoverflow as well:
[1]: Favourite programming related academic papers
[2]: Influential books every programmer should read
[3]: Favourite (or most brilliant) Algorithms
[1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/358033/what-are-your-favorite-programming-related-academic-papers http://stackoverflow.com/questions/358033/what-are-your-favo...
[2]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1711/what-is-the-single-most-influential-book-every-programmer-should-read http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1711/what-is-the-single-m...
[3]: http://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/189/algorithms-from-the-book http://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/189/algorithms-f...
- gtani 13y agoVery accurate title. About 40 links, some you really should read, and some you maybe be aware of... this also, re fogus' blog https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2979458 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2979458 http://blog.fogus.me/2011/09/08/10-technical-papers-every-programmer-should-read-at-least-twice/ http://blog.fogus.me/2011/09/08/10-technical-papers-every-pr...
- jakejake 13y agoSomebody should post a "list of the top 10 lists that every programmer should read" which is a listing of article listings.
- foobarbazqux 13y agoI hope you are not joking! Lists are serious business on the internet! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lists_of_lists https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lists_of_lists
- lolcraft 13y ago> Note that this list is itself a list of lists, and thus in theory satisfies the normal criterion for inclusion here; however, it has not been included, since the purpose of the article is to serve as a directory to other lists of lists. ... Gödelgasm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_paradox
- foobarbazqux 13y agoSets are even seriouser business.
- ISL 13y agoLooking at the Talk page, it's surprising to me that the page isn't self referential. How can't it be?