4 ms·
This is really dumb. Firstly, I'd bet dollars to donuts that his ISP advertises "up to" a certain speed and includes language in the T&Cs that specifies speeds
by gabemart 13y ago
This is really dumb.
Firstly, I'd bet dollars to donuts that his ISP advertises "up to" a certain speed and includes language in the T&Cs that specifies speeds may vary based on a variety of factors.
Secondly, is this even taking network overheads into account?
Thirdly, saying "kids in Africa might have 14kB/s for their whole connection, therefore that amount of bandwidth is worth fighting for" is dumb because it assumes constant marginal utility of bandwidth when that's obviously not the case. Going from 0kB/s to 14kB/s is a hell of a lot more valuable than going from 14kB/s to 28kB/s, and going from 14kB/s to 28kB/s is many orders of magnitude more valuable than going from 882kB/s to 896kB/s.
- ktsmith 13y agoHis ISP also likely only guarantees 70% of the advertised speeds be available and that the advertised speeds are theoretical maximums. This is what companies like AT&T and Charter do.
- tovmeod 13y agoLast I lived in brazil they needed to guarantee only 10% of advertised speed, if I got 70% I would be happy