3 ms·
Never really had any problems reading/understanding dynamic code, actually I (and this is highly subjective) think it's easier to read dynamic code because you
by Skinney 13y ago
Never really had any problems reading/understanding dynamic code, actually I (and this is highly subjective) think it's easier to read dynamic code because you don't need to read a lot of extra code written to satisfy a compiler.
I agree completely when it comes to refactoring/modifying code though. This can become cumbersome, especially if you don't have unit tests.
- zerr 13y agoWell, what you call an extra code to help to satisfy a compile, I call a part of a documentation which helps understanding the code, in addition with some static integrity checking :)
- Skinney 13y agoI understand the argument. In my experience though, documentation and/or tests usually always makes type info redundant. But I'm well aware that people have different views on this. Each to his own.