Alternatively, this is why Java needs a real namespace mechanism. "package" doesn't cut it. See: namespaces in C# or C++, or alternately modules in ML. One thi

Alternatively, this is why Java needs a real namespace mechanism. "package" doesn't cut it. See: namespaces in C# or C++, or alternately modules in ML. One thing I like about DI implemented in a language itself is that is that it negates the need to make factories in all cases. So, essentially, imagine if Java had C# style namespace and this was done using Guice-style DI. bind(Persistance::Manager.class).toProvider( new Provider<>() { public Persistance::Manager get() { new Persistence::Manager::TransactionAware(); } });