>What I'm trying to say is if you want the military to be different, tell the civilian leadership, don't tell the soldiers at the bottom. What if the circumsta

>What I'm trying to say is if you want the military to be different, tell the civilian leadership, don't tell the soldiers at the bottom. What if the circumstances arise that the civilian leadership and the process to get them elected is not effective for the (majority) people, will the military step up for the people (like it has in Turkey throughout history on occasions, or what like what is going on in Brazil)? Maybe what I am asking is: are there cases where "effective militaries" would be enabled/allowed to circumvent traditional civilian leadership? (I do not believe this is the case [yet] in the United States since the majority seems complicit [perhaps passively] with the actions of its civilian leadership.)