3 ms·
Even I'm not confident in the correct interpretation of that. In context, it seems like a test in following directions, where the correct answer is to ignore in
by gizmo686 13y ago
Even I'm not confident in the correct interpretation of that. In context, it seems like a test in following directions, where the correct answer is to ignore instructions 2..n-1. However, the last instruction does not say to ignore the previous one, so it seems like the correct answer is to treat the instructions as a series of sequential commands, where you put down your pencil when you are finished..
- cafard 13y agoNo doubt I have the wording slightly wrong: I took that in September or October of 1966. But whatever the exact wording, those who sat quietly with a sheet empty but for the name got 100% and the rest of us got 0%. [edit: why be coy about the date?]