3 ms·
I'm also a Sublime Text 2 paying customer who doesn't actively recommend the editor, though I find a lot to like about it. For me, the reason is a bit more day
by georgemcbay 13y ago
I'm also a Sublime Text 2 paying customer who doesn't actively recommend the editor, though I find a lot to like about it.
For me, the reason is a bit more day-to-day practical in that I find myself increasingly doing development on Linux systems running on ARM chips and Sublime Text has no support for ARM builds. It is something often asked for in the forums and on the userecho site but is always shot down by the developer.
Editors are an odd case for me as a developer in that I'd rather use an editor I like slightly less that works on every platform I use in a consistent manner than use one that I like more but has limited platform support.
- levosmetalo 13y agoIf it had something like tramp in Emacs, that wouldn't be an issue. Heck, I sometimes log in to remote VPS where I have an Emacs configured to suit all my needs, open Emacs there and edit file on my local machine using Emacs tramp.
- DigitalJack 13y agoThere is an excellent sftp sync plugin for sublime text. It's not free but has a similar nag trial option. I don't have the name or link off hand though.
- drewda 13y agoDo you mean http://wbond.net/sublime_packages/sftp http://wbond.net/sublime_packages/sftp ? I hope Will Bond makes some money from that, given all the time (and hosting expenses) he puts in for the indispensable Sublime Package Control: http://wbond.net/sublime_packages/package_control http://wbond.net/sublime_packages/package_control
- ansgri 13y agoThere's sshfs for linux, use whatever editor you want. I still hadn't find a decent client for Windows though.