3 ms·

Maybe goto http://wikileaks.org/ http://wikileaks.org/ There is more than US only leaks... Guess that wouldn't fit your narrative though, so maybe don't go.

• mpyne 13y ago
  Well I went. Didn't see anything about the Ecuador leaks though. Should I wait another few months maybe? I did see Syria Files though, and was even briefly excited, but I see that WikiLeaks was able to work in a dig at the whole West in the synopsis alone so now I'm sad again.
  • Volpe 13y ago
    Are you saying that the files don't implicate 'western' companies/government? You are passing judgement on wikileaks becasue they don't have a leak... But I thought wikileaks was just an option for leaked documents, they don't proactively hunt leaks... Am I wrong on that?
    • mpyne 13y ago
      The persons who leaked to BuzzFeed tried to go to WikiLeaks three days before. WikiLeaks says they have no record of that so maybe the leakers simply couldn't figure out how to properly submit. But the story's been out for like 2-3 days now apparently, certainly would be useful for WikiLeaks to archive surveillance state abuses by Western democracies, no?
      • Volpe 13y ago
        ... I'm sorry, I really don't understand your position. Wikileaks isn't an archiving system, it's a way to publish leaks... If Wikileaks is proven to be rejecting leaks (which is unproven allegations at the moment) then I could understand your point. But you are literally just believing some random on the internet, which could well be an effort by the US to discredit Wikileaks and Ecuador at the same time (purely speculation). What wikileaks do is not complicated, you can always create an alternative. They'd probably support your efforts.