3 ms·
This is a textbook case of extra-legal harassment. There was an excellent article of this subject in the recent issue of 2600[1], which unfortunately is not av
by calhoun137 13y ago
This is a textbook case of extra-legal harassment. There was an excellent article of this subject in the recent issue of 2600[1], which unfortunately is not available online, but can be found in any Barnes and Nobles.
When an individual meaningfully opposes the state, they become a target of extra legal harassment, which includes attacks from outside the legal system, as well as within it. This includes things such as police raids of your home, intimidation of friends/family, trumped up charges designed to bring you into financial ruin, hit pieces in the media, and much more.
For example, $20,000 that was raised for Brown's legal defense from supporters was confiscated by the courts[2].
The entire purpose of extra legal harassment is to get a person to give up, and correspondingly, the best way to fight back is to continue doing activism, and to survive.
In this case, Brown made a major mistake by threatening an FBI agent in a you tube video. Perhaps if he had been less naive about the inevitable repercussions of his activism, he would have been better prepared for the campaign against him and would have known that his primary goal should be to survive and be able to continue his work, and that the worst mistake he could make is to give the authorities an excuse to lock him up.
[1] http://store.2600.com/spring2013.html http://store.2600.com/spring2013.html
[2] http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2013/04/18/feds-seize-barrett-browns-legal-defense-fund/ http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2013/04/18/feds-seize-barre...
- thatthatis 13y agoThe 20,000 was held pending use to pay part of the cost of the public defender http://cryptome.org/2013/04/brown-050.pdf http://cryptome.org/2013/04/brown-050.pdf. In other words, it is being used to pay for his legal defense.
- calhoun137 13y agoIsn't the purpose of a legal defense fund so that the person doesn't have to use a public defender? They are saying if you can't afford a lawyer, one will be appointed for you, and if you can afford a lawyer, then your money will be confiscated and we will use it to pay the lawyer we appointed for you.