6 ms·
Are you implying that Flash is any less resource intensive or buggy?
by rubberband 13y ago
Are you implying that Flash is any less resource intensive or buggy?
- kenbellows 13y agoWhere did he mention Flash? HTML5 video is the alternative being discussed here, and it's far less resource intensive and buggy (depending on the video format), from my experience at least.
- jspaur 13y agoTo be fair, he mentioned Youtube, which even in Chrome uses Flash by default.
- bestdayever 13y agohttp://www.youtube.com/html5 http://www.youtube.com/html5 granted it doesn't always work.
- smackfu 13y agoAFAIK, HTML5 video on a Mac pretty much requires it to be H264, which Apple has optimized their whole stack for.