3 ms·
I'm at a loss to explain how such a well-worded article ended up with such an unrelated title. I don't think the author blamed the media once, and I honestly do
by mpyne 13y ago
I'm at a loss to explain how such a well-worded article ended up with such an unrelated title. I don't think the author blamed the media once, and I honestly don't think that's what he really means.
The people are part of the "national conversation" too, so to the extent that they refuse to have a serious conversation on Twitter I don't see how you blame that on the media.
- chimeracoder 13y agoI'm at a loss to see how an article with this title ended up on CNN. CNN probably takes the cake for the most unprofessional, irresponsible journalism in their coverage of PRISM. (Sorkin is a close second, only because of the irony of someone from the New York Times saying that a journalist should be prosecuted for publishing leaked information[0]) [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_Papers