5 ms·
It might just have been intended as a neutral statement about the situation. There's no need to jump to conclusions.
by nhaehnle 13y ago
It might just have been intended as a neutral statement about the situation. There's no need to jump to conclusions.
- wavefunction 13y agoOr speculative even. This would only constitute an implicit threat if there was some realistic expectation that the message would be somehow communicated to the target, imo.
- abraininavat 13y agoA neutral statement? Not with the Poor little Siggi part.
- TallGuyShort 13y agoI've seen 6 comments in this thread that stuck out to me as being particularly good. It just occurred to me they were all yours.
- nhaehnle 13y agoYes, even with that part. It makes the statement derisive and in bad taste (so perhaps my choice of "neutral" was not the best possible). It does not make the statement a threat.