3 ms·
Exactly. Although there are some great people who work with/at/for the organization, Assange's character, from my point of view, is damaging their reputation a
by ruddi 13y ago
Exactly. Although there are some great people who work with/at/for the organization, Assange's character, from my point of view, is damaging their reputation a little. He should step back (not quit but get out of the limelight) and let someone else be the "front" for the organization. Kristinn Hrafnsson would be a good choice IMO.
But they have handled the Snowden case well it seems and that gives me some confidence.
- aet 13y agoI think that's a hard thing for someone to do.. ego or no.
- at-fates-hands 13y ago>>>But they have handled the Snowden case well it seems and that gives me some confidence. I have to give them credit for that. Assange didn't jump in and hog the limelight and for the most part, WikiLeaks has stayed quiet and reserved during this whole ordeal. They acted incredibly professional throughout.
- lifeisstillgood 13y agohogging limelight gets difficult from "exile" in one room in the Ecuadorian embassy. However I do think an earlier poster was right - a change of personnel at the top of wikileaks might be their best chance of staying the course
- CatMtKing 13y agoWhich begs the question: how familiar are you with Assange? Aside from reading articles that try to characterize him, have you read any of his writings or listened to his talks? Have you met him? What basis are you using to judge his character? I personally am under the impression that he has given much more thought to his policies for releasing information and organizing Wikileaks than you give him credit for.