4 ms·

Your rage is directed at the wrong person. The guy up front isn't the guy who originally proposed it. That's not how political parties work.

• Nursie 13y ago
  He certainly championed the cause of censorship during his time in office, which is not something I could overlook in a politician, in fact I find it abhorrent. Again, sorry, but I don't share your viewpoint, the censorship stuff is not something I would overlook because of other, more positive work.
  • tomflack 13y ago
    You're not understanding, so I'll just stop. You don't need to apologise for not sharing my view, but you do need to realise things aren't as black-and-white as you like to see them.
    • Nursie 13y ago
      I'm sorry, I'm not understanding what? I understand that a guy in high public office may have done a few good things while there, as well as being on the side of some stuff that many people consider inherently evil and anti-democratic. I don't care who proposed it. I don't care if it was initially someone else's idea. I don't care if it's party policy and he just got the job of putting his face and political power behind it. He still did and said all those things and to my mind should have no place in politics as a result.