>it is good that there is software that understands G-code for 3D printers, but using it as _the_ data format? People don't really write G-code anymore, it's g

>it is good that there is software that understands G-code for 3D printers, but using it as _the_ data format? People don't really write G-code anymore, it's generated from a 3D model. G-code is like the compiled version of the model made for execution on the printer. >Also, I don't even think G-code is that good of an idea for generic CNC files Why make such a ridiculous assumption when you just said you heard about this only 5 minutes ago? You're making a blanket statement about a technology that's been around for more than 40 years based on 5 minutes of googling.