12 ms·
I would go as far as saying "pretty much everyone but Mac users". Of course, then I would be just as guilty of generalizing without any hard data as the author
by alex_c 18y ago
I would go as far as saying "pretty much everyone but Mac users".
Of course, then I would be just as guilty of generalizing without any hard data as the author of the article.
ARE there any numbers on this?
Edit:
Here's a report from 2000:
http://www.evolt.org/article/Real_World_Browser_Size_Stats_Part_II/20/2297/index.html http://www.evolt.org/article/Real_World_Browser_Size_Stats_P...
And another from 2006:
http://www.baekdal.com/reports/Actual-Browser-Sizes/actual-browser-sizes/ http://www.baekdal.com/reports/Actual-Browser-Sizes/actual-b...
- abstractbill 18y agoNice, so it looks like reality is exactly the opposite of what the author claims. Thanks for finding the data!
- dcurtis 18y agoInteresting. I'll update my post. Also, hilariously... http://dustincurtis.com/screenshots/Actual_Browser_Sizes_%28final%29_-_Reports_-_Baekdal.com-20090505-174638.jpg http://dustincurtis.com/screenshots/Actual_Browser_Sizes_%28...
- tdavis 18y agoThis doesn't take into account wider resolutions such as 1920x1200 which is what I've been running at for years. My browser takes up 2/3 of the screen and only 3/4 of that space is actual viewable page. Having it wider than that is generally unnecessary and a waste of space.
- alex_c 18y agoThat's why I mentioned the years, those reports are a bit old. Still, even today, 1920x1200 is far from accounting for "most" users.
- deleted 18y ago[deleted]