I'd love to see a definitive source one way or the other... But your point seems to be "all sources are wrong" so I'm not sure what to do with that. I certainl

I'd love to see a definitive source one way or the other... But your point seems to be "all sources are wrong" so I'm not sure what to do with that. I certainly have no reason to believe some guy on hackernews (i.e., you) more than the findings of a federal judge and his staff. So, at this point, I have something like "accepted opinion" and "doubt" -- i.e., unless you can cite or explain something. In this case, the ideal source would explain why this is so frequently misreported, not simply assert that it is always misreported. Also, it would explain why it was an impossibility.