4 ms·
So what's a good alternative (Firefox)? I'm using GlimmerBlocker, but due to being a proxy, it can't filter HTTPS pages. Adblock Edge looks like a decrapified
by sdfjkl 13y ago
So what's a good alternative (Firefox)? I'm using GlimmerBlocker, but due to being a proxy, it can't filter HTTPS pages.
Adblock Edge looks like a decrapified fork of Adblock Plus.
- gasull 13y agoFirefox addons for privacy and security with usable settings: - AdBlock Edge. Filter subscriptions: EasyList, EasyPrivacy, Disable Malware, Fanboy's Annoyance List, Prebake - NoScript. Use "allow scripts globally" or otherwise most websites won't work. It will still protect against know attacks. - Cookie Monster. Then set global/default preference to saving cookies for session only. - FireGloves. Uncheck "disable plugin and mimeType lists" in Cloak Settings. - HTTPS Everywhere - LastPass
- shaggy 13y agoIs there some mistake in your NoScript item? Installing the plug-in and then using "allow scripts globally" is the equivalent of never installing the plug-in. It provides almost no value at all when run that way.
- gasull 13y agoNo. It stills protects against known attacks, like XSS attacks. If you block scripts by default you'll have to configure what scripts to allow every time you visit a new site, or every time the site adds new assets.
- 83a 13y agorequestpolicy <- simply blocks all traffic to external webserver
- gasull 13y agoRequestPolicy suffers of the same problem as NoScript with default settings: it blocks everything and you have to waste time configuring what JS files are allowed in each site you visit. Your browsing becomes 10,000% more inefficient.
- eliasmacpherson 13y agoI use noscript as well as adblock plus.
- ra 13y agoGhostery. Can't recommend it highly enough; also works on Chrome, Safari, Opera and IE.
- asb 13y agoGhostery users should be aware of: http://www.businessinsider.com/evidon-sells-ghostery-data-to-advertisers-2013-6 http://www.businessinsider.com/evidon-sells-ghostery-data-to... (no judgement on the practice implied, just flagging it as something for potential users to consider).
- JonnieCache 13y agoGhostery alternative: https://disconnect.me https://disconnect.me
- jrochkind1 13y agoDisconnect has generally been working better for me than Ghostery did too; although some parts of the Disconnect UI I still find more confusing and harder to use than analagous parts of ghostery.
- fakeer 13y agoLast time I checked it was not fully open source. Is it yet?
- WickyNilliams 13y agoAnd open source apparently! https://github.com/disconnectme/disconnect https://github.com/disconnectme/disconnect
- nivla 13y agoBut isn't that only if you enable Ghost Rank, which is disabled by default?
- dombili 13y agoThat's correct.
- chmod775 13y agoI just founds this, it's a fork of Adblock Plus: https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/?src=search https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/adblock-edge/?sr...
- chalst 13y agoThe easiest to audit is to change /etc/hosts to send malware sites to 127.0.0.1. I use Dan Pollock's hosts file, which is well-commented: http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/ http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/ I keep a Git repository with the contents that I update from time to time - this makes it easier to do diffs against past versions: https://github.com/chalst/pollockhostsfork https://github.com/chalst/pollockhostsfork
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- chalst 13y agoOn the hardware I've looked at, loopback requests are handled in well under a microsecond - I guess this case is not worth optimising. On Linux, 127.0.0.0 is a broadcast address, while on Windows, it is a sink address.
- dbcooper 13y agoIf you want a smaller HOSTS file (useful with Windows) that only targets advertisement and tracking servers, I've found HP Hosts' ad_servers.asp list to be good. http://hosts-file.net/ad_servers.asp http://hosts-file.net/ad_servers.asp
- mjn 13y agoI use the venerable (but still actively maintained) Privoxy, which is a proxy but still does most of what I want on HTTPS pages. It can't examine the page contents themselves, but it can block 3rd-party requests by hostname, which gets most of the web-bugs and such.
- claudius 13y agoI had some problems with loading times/pipelining in Opera (12.x) and Privoxy and hence changed to AdBlock (which appears to be the same as AdBlock Chrome referred to above). Browsing became much smoother afterwards.
- anoymous9352 13y agoPrivoxy is associated with SPI, which is a 501(c)(3) non-profit. A far cry from that shady AdBlock garbage. If you sacrifice privacy/security for convenience, don't be surprised when it has later repercussions. Privoxy is also highly configurable unlike AdBlock. I don't know about you, but I don't want to be at the mercy of some jerkoff named Wladimir, who seems to have basically zero accountability and a very lax sense of ethics.