3 ms·
> in support of applying government coercion to mutually agreed trades between people. ...But it isn't mutually agreed. It is enforced by social stigma. Very u
by geon 13y ago
> in support of applying government coercion to mutually agreed trades between people.
...But it isn't mutually agreed. It is enforced by social stigma. Very unfree if you ask me.
> I don't go to McDonalds, but I go to other restaurants. So converting all restaurants to McDonalds would cost them my business, that's kinda the point.
Now you are just trolling. You seriously believe every restaurant would turn into McDonalds by not accepting tips?
> It's called freedom.
No, it is called anarchy.
- smsm42 13y agoOf course, free means you get to do what you like and everybody has to like it and tell you so in polite yet colorful language. Otherwise it is not a true freedom - true freedom can only be total absence of consequences for you actions and complete subjugation of others to your wishes, right? If you do something and somebody says its wrong, then is it "very unfree", right? In true freedom, he'd be forbidden from doing this. >>> You seriously believe every restaurant would turn into McDonalds by not accepting tips? No, I believe there is place for different things, even if I don't like some of them. You, on the other hand, believe only things you like deserve to exist and for some reason feel entitled to use government coercion to serve you.