3 ms·

What I believe was meant is that the attribute of having an answer is not a sufficient reason to keep a question from being closed.

• rhizome 13y ago
  I think you/they missed my second paragraph, then. I'm not arguing against the concept of moderation, but simply that this is well-trod territory.
  • jackmaney 13y ago
    Nothing in your second paragraph refutes the fact that the Stack Exchange network of sites was never meant to be a repository for all answerable questions.
    • rhizome 13y ago
      Where did I say that it was?
      • jackmaney 13y ago
        > A question that receives answers fits [in Stack Overflow], I don't know how you could say otherwise.