as i understand it, the issue with the wikipedia article was that it [the article] was badly put together, and had no citations. rather than reverting the chan

as i understand it, the issue with the wikipedia article was that it [the article] was badly put together, and had no citations. rather than reverting the changes, try creating a better article from scratch. (of course, its locked until the 12th to prevent a flood of people trying to revert it, but just wait until the 13th)