There is possible evidence that a crime may have been committed (by both the US Government and Snowden). It is for the legal system to decide if people are gui

There is possible evidence that a crime may have been committed (by both the US Government and Snowden). It is for the legal system to decide if people are guilty. You are putting this evidence within a narrative which is interesting, but irrelevant in deciding who is guilty and who is innocent (which I hope the courts will be allowed to decide). You have to admit that legal grey areas have been allowed to emerge in recent years that are dangerous? If you want to be given the benefit of the doubt, the legal basis should be open and clear.