2 ms·
Don't agree with 1&4, but 2&3 are subsets of a feature of the Clojure landscape: the guys behind Clojure aren't laser focused on driving adoption like, for inst
by moomin 13y ago
Don't agree with 1&4, but 2&3 are subsets of a feature of the Clojure landscape: the guys behind Clojure aren't laser focused on driving adoption like, for instance, Scala is.
Indeed, some of them don't really like the idea of a "Clojure Community".
http://stuartsierra.com/2013/01/16/the-reluctant-dictator http://stuartsierra.com/2013/01/16/the-reluctant-dictator
On the other hand, there's an amazing focus on doing the right thing rather than throwing features at a wall, which I like immensely. Sadly, long lists of new features seems to drive adoption. :(