4 ms·
I think a credible argument can be made that disclosing activity which directly and obviously contravenes the constitution is not treason. I'd say the builders
by danenania 13y ago
I think a credible argument can be made that disclosing activity which directly and obviously contravenes the constitution is not treason.
I'd say the builders and enablers of an international secret totalitarian surveillance system are the ones guilty of treason. They are the traitors who should be on trial.
- aqme28 13y agoWell it's definitely not treason, but that's because our constitution defines treason in very narrow terms (which I think is good).