3 ms·
Being that he has already confessed on video and presumably there's a good amount of other evidence the government would have nothing to gain from an unfair tri
by jsz0 13y ago
Being that he has already confessed on video and presumably there's a good amount of other evidence the government would have nothing to gain from an unfair trial.
- mayneack 13y agoAs opposed to all that they gained from their treatment of Bradley Manning.
- doki_pen 13y agoHe never confessed to treason.
- mpyne 13y agoHe confessed to infiltrating the NSA via B-A-H for the purpose of grabbing material to later leak to the public. He may not have realized it at the time but that's very damning, especially since he went out of his way to get information relating to Chinese hacking activities.
- doki_pen 13y ago[edit: added more] Are we fighting a war with China? From Wikipedia: Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aiding or involved by such an endeavor. The point is, if we can argue about it, then there should be a fair trial to determine whether or not it was treason. The president and other leaders saying it's treason doesn't lend itself to a fair trial in the future. The appropriate response is "He committed crimes, we will have a trial to determine the extent of those crimes and whether or not it is treason".
- mpyne 13y agoYou're focusing way too much on treason. There's probably 5 other felonies besides that Snowden would be guilty of without even having to think about treason charges.