4 ms·
Not really - it just means they aren't very efficient at monetizing music. Why should artists subsidize a channel that devalues their art?
by embolism 13y ago
Not really - it just means they aren't very efficient at monetizing music. Why should artists subsidize a channel that devalues their art?
- genwin 13y agoThey shouldn't of course. The point being made was that Pandora isn't laughing all the way to the bank.
- embolism 13y agoThat's true. The basic problem does seem to be that people love music enough to have paid a reasonable amount for it in the past, but now have been conditioned to believe that it is cheaper than it really is.