First, I think you'd have a hard time finding anything good to read if you only stuck with writers who sound wrong when they're wrong. Second, Stein's anti-evo

First, I think you'd have a hard time finding anything good to read if you only stuck with writers who sound wrong when they're wrong. Second, Stein's anti-evolution thing is a religious belief and you'd be wise to forgive someone's apparently irrational thinking in that area. Religion is special. (But anyway I'm fine with ad hominem judgments. They're useful.)