> the position you're arguing for is literally the opposite of innovation. So what? I dont see any innovation here. It is haute couture like change for change

> the position you're arguing for is literally the opposite of innovation. So what? I dont see any innovation here. It is haute couture like change for changes sake masqueraded as innovation. Computers have become too important tools to allow a few key players to enforce a crazy planned obsolescence cycle. > Imagine if, after Apple unveiled the iPhone I was not talking about toys.